Automate academic literature reviews with GPT-4 and multi-database search

Open on n8n.io

$20/month : Unlimited workflows

2500 executions/month

Try free

THE #1 IN WEB SCRAPING

Scrape any website without limits

Try free

HOSTINGER

Early Deal
DISCOUNT 20%

Self-hosted n8n

Unlimited workflows - from $4.99/mo

Try free

#1 hub for scraping, AI & automation

6000+ actors - $5 credits/mo

Try free

Important notice

This workflow is provided as-is. Please review and test before using in production.

1. Workflow Overview

Conducting comprehensive literature reviews is one of the most time consuming aspects of academic research. This workflow revolutionizes the process by automating literature search, paper analysis,...

Best for

AI RAG automation workflows
Multimodal AI automation workflows
intermediate n8n builders looking for reusable templates

Tools used

n8n-nodes-base.stickynote, n8n-nodes-base.set, n8n-nodes-pdfvector.pdfvector, n8n-nodes-base.code, n8n-nodes-base.splitinbatches, n8n-nodes-base.if, n8n-nodes-base.openai

Source and attribution

This workflow is cataloged by N8N Workflows and links back to its original n8n.io source page by PDF Vector.

Original n8n.io source

1.1 Workflow description

Title: Automate academic literature reviews with GPT-4 and multi-database search
Workflow name: Automate academic literature reviews with GPT-4 and multi-database search

Overview

Conducting comprehensive literature reviews is one of the most time-consuming aspects of academic research. This workflow revolutionizes the process by automating literature search, paper analysis, and review generation across multiple academic databases. It handles both digital papers and scanned documents (PDFs, JPGs, PNGs), using OCR technology for older publications or image-based content.

What You Can Do

Automate searches across multiple academic databases simultaneously
Analyze and rank papers by relevance, citations, and impact
Generate comprehensive literature reviews with proper citations
Process both digital and scanned documents with OCR
Identify research gaps and emerging trends systematically

Who It's For

Researchers, graduate students, academic institutions, literature review teams, and academic writers who need to conduct comprehensive literature reviews efficiently while maintaining high quality and thoroughness.

The Problem It Solves

Manual literature reviews are extremely time-consuming and often miss relevant papers across different databases. Researchers struggle to synthesize large volumes of academic papers, track citations properly, and identify research gaps systematically. This template automates the entire process from search to synthesis, ensuring comprehensive coverage and proper citation management.

Setup Instructions:

Configure PDF Vector API credentials with academic search access
Set up search parameters including databases and date ranges
Define inclusion and exclusion criteria for paper selection
Choose citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.)
Configure output format preferences
Set up reference management software integration if needed
Define research topic and keywords for search

Key Features:

Simultaneous search across PubMed, arXiv, Semantic Scholar, and other databases
Intelligent paper ranking based on citation count, recency, and relevance
OCR support for scanned documents and older publications
Automatic extraction of methodologies, findings, and limitations
Citation network analysis to identify seminal works
Automatic theme organization and research gap identification
Multiple citation format support (APA, MLA, Chicago)
Quality scoring based on journal impact factors

Customization Options:

Configure search parameters for specific research domains
Set up automated searches for ongoing literature monitoring
Integrate with reference management software (Zotero, Mendeley)
Customize output format and structure
Add collaborative review features for research teams
Set up quality filters based on journal rankings
Configure notification systems for new relevant papers

Implementation Details: The workflow uses advanced algorithms to search multiple academic databases simultaneously, ranking papers by relevance and impact. It processes full-text PDFs when available and uses OCR for scanned documents. The system automatically extracts key information, organizes findings by themes, and generates structured literature reviews with proper citations and reference management.

Note: This workflow uses the PDF Vector community node. Make sure to install it from the n8n community nodes collection before using this template.

1.2 Logical Blocks

This catalog entry is organized from the workflow JSON. The node-level section below shows the executable blocks available for review before importing the template.

2. Block-by-Block Analysis

Block 1 - Review Overview

Type / Role: n8n-nodes-base.stickyNote - stickyNote
Config choices: Version 1

Block 2 - Database Search

Type / Role: n8n-nodes-base.stickyNote - stickyNote
Config choices: Version 1

Block 3 - Study Quality

Type / Role: n8n-nodes-base.stickyNote - stickyNote
Config choices: Version 1

Block 4 - Final Review

Type / Role: n8n-nodes-base.stickyNote - stickyNote
Config choices: Version 1

Block 5 - Set Search Parameters

Type / Role: n8n-nodes-base.set - set
Config choices: Version 1

Block 6 - PDF Vector - Search Papers

Type / Role: n8n-nodes-pdfvector.pdfVector - pdfVector
Config choices: Version 1

Block 7 - Rank & Select Papers

Type / Role: n8n-nodes-base.code - code
Config choices: Version 2

Block 8 - Process One by One

Type / Role: n8n-nodes-base.splitInBatches - splitInBatches
Config choices: Version 1

Block 9 - Has PDF?

Type / Role: n8n-nodes-base.if - if
Config choices: Version 1

Block 10 - PDF Vector - Parse Paper

Type / Role: n8n-nodes-pdfvector.pdfVector - pdfVector
Config choices: Version 1

Block 11 - Analyze Paper Content

Type / Role: n8n-nodes-base.openAi - openAi
Config choices: Version 1

Block 12 - Store Review Entry

Type / Role: n8n-nodes-base.set - set
Config choices: Version 1

Block 13 - Compile Literature Review

Type / Role: n8n-nodes-base.code - code
Config choices: Version 2

3. Summary Table

Workflow	Automate academic literature reviews with GPT-4 and multi-database search
Complexity	intermediate
Nodes	13
Categories	AI RAG, Multimodal AI
Author	PDF Vector
Published	12 Sept 2025

4. Reproducing the Workflow from Scratch

1. Download the workflow JSON

Use the JSON export at /data/workflows/8503/8503.json as the source template for this automation.
2. Import the template into n8n

Open n8n, import the downloaded JSON, and review each node before activating the workflow.
3. Configure credentials and variables

Replace placeholder credentials, API keys, webhook URLs, account IDs, and environment-specific values with your own settings.
4. Test with sample data

Run the workflow manually or in a staging workspace, inspect node output, and confirm downstream systems receive the expected data.
5. Activate and monitor

Enable the workflow only after testing, then monitor executions, errors, and rate limits during the first production runs.

5. General Notes & Resources

Review imported nodes carefully before activation. This catalog entry is intended to help you inspect the workflow structure, understand required services, and find related templates faster.

Node names, credentials, schedules, webhook paths, and external service limits may need adjustment for your workspace.

Download workflow JSON Original n8n.io source AI RAG workflows Multimodal AI workflows

Frequently asked questions

What does Automate academic literature reviews with GPT-4 and multi-database search do?

What do I need before importing this workflow?

Review the workflow JSON, configure any required credentials in n8n, and test the automation in a safe workspace before using it in production.

Can I customize this workflow?

Yes. Use the block-by-block analysis and the downloadable JSON to inspect each node, then adjust credentials, prompts, schedules, filters, or destinations for your AI RAG, Multimodal AI use case.

PDF Vector

20 workflows

Nodes

n8n-nodes-base.stickynote n8n-nodes-base.set n8n-nodes-pdfvector.pdfvector n8n-nodes-base.code n8n-nodes-base.splitinbatches n8n-nodes-base.if n8n-nodes-base.openai

Complexity

intermediate

Published 12 Sept 2025

Likes 0

View on n8n.io Download Workflow

Install path: /data/workflows/8503/8503.json

Share Your Workflow

Have a useful automation to share? Publish it and help the community.

Submit Your Template How to Submit

Related Workflows

Route RAG customer support across WhatsApp and Outlook with Pinecone and OpenRouter

## Quick overview A production-ready 3-workflow system that handles customer support across WhatsApp and Email using RAG-powered AI. Automatically routes queries, detects escalation intent, logs handoffs to Google Sheets, alerts your team via Slack, and lets agents resolve cases with a single slash command. ## How it works 1. A form trigger accepts PDF, DOCX, and TXT documents, chunks them with a token splitter, embeds them using Google Gemini, and stores them in your Pinecone vector store to build the AI knowledge base. 2. Incoming messages from WhatsApp Business Cloud API and Microsoft Outlook are each normalized into a unified contact format — capturing channel, contact ID, name, and message text — before merging into a single pipeline. 3. Every message is checked against a Google Sheets handoff tracker. If the contact is currently assigned to a human agent, the message is forwarded directly to Slack without any AI involvement. 4. For active (non-handoff) contacts, the AI Support Agent queries Pinecone via RAG, pulls context from a sliding conversation memory window, and returns a structured JSON output containing a reply and a handoff_requested flag. 5. If the AI detects escalation intent or has no answer, it sets handoff_requested: true — the contact is logged to Google Sheets, AI goes silent for that contact, and a detailed alert is posted to your Slack support channel. 6. Answers are routed back through the originating channel — WhatsApp replies via Business Cloud API, email replies via Microsoft Outlook — keeping every conversation native to its platform. 7. Support agents run /resolve [contact_id] in Slack to close a handoff. The workflow validates the input, updates the Google Sheets row with agent name and timestamp, re-enables AI for that contact, and confirms resolution in the Slack channel. ## Setup 1. Pinecone + Embeddings: Create a Pinecone index and add your Pinecone credential to the "Insert into Vector Store" and "Knowledge Base" nodes. Set your Google Gemini API credential on both Embeddings nodes (one in Workflow 1, one in Workflow 2). 2. WhatsApp: Connect your WhatsApp Business Cloud API credential to the WhatsApp Trigger node. Replace YOUR_WHATSAPP_PHONE_NUMBER_ID in both Send WhatsApp Message nodes. 3. Email: Add your Microsoft Outlook OAuth2 credential to the Outlook Trigger and the Send Email Answer node. 4. Handoff Sheet: Create a Google Sheet with a tab named Handoffs and these column headers exactly: contact_id | channel | contact_name | status | handoff_since | resolved_by | resolved_at. Set your Google Sheets credential and paste your Sheet ID into all four Google Sheets nodes across Workflows 2 and 3. 5. Slack: Create a Slack bot app, add it to your support channel, and set the credential in all three Slack nodes. Update the channel name if yours differs from #support-handoff. 6. AI Model: Add your OpenRouter (or OpenAI) API key to the Chat Model node. Swap the model slug in node settings as needed. 7. Slash Command: Activate Workflow 3 first to generate its production webhook URL. Then in your Slack app settings go to Slash Commands → Create New → set command to /resolve → paste the webhook URL → reinstall app to workspace. 8. Activate order: Workflow 1 (KB ingestion) → Workflow 3 (resolve handler) → Workflow 2 (main support flow). ## Requirements - n8n (self-hosted or cloud) - WhatsApp Business Cloud API account (Meta Developer App) - Microsoft 365 / Outlook account - Pinecone account - Google Gemini API key - OpenRouter or OpenAI API key or Any other LLM - Google Sheets - Slack workspace with a custom bot app ## Customization - Edit the system prompt in the AI Support Agent node to match your brand voice, support scope, and escalation rules - Swap Google Gemini Embeddings for OpenAI Embeddings — just replace the Embeddings node and ensure your Pinecone index dimensions match - dd more channels (Telegram, Instagram DM, etc.) by normalizing their payloads into the same contact format and feeding them into the Merge node - Adjust conversation memory window (default: 8 messages) in the Conversation Memory node - Trigger the resolve webhook from your CRM or helpdesk instead of Slack if preferred ## Additional info All three workflows must be active simultaneously for the system to function Handoff state is persisted in Google Sheets and survives n8n restarts or server reboots Once a contact enters handoff, the AI is completely silent for that contact — no accidental double-responses Document metadata (filename, uploader name, timestamp) is stored alongside vectors in Pinecone for full traceability Default chunk settings: 500 tokens / 100 overlap — tune in the Token Splitter node based on your document style Contact / Support 🔗 n8n Templates: n8n.io/creators/salmanmehboob 💼 LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/salman-mehboob-pro 📧 Email: [email protected] 💬 WhatsApp: +92 306 746 6499

View

Detect semantic duplicate website pages with Google Drive, Postgres and Ollama

## Quick overview This workflow scans HTML files in a Google Drive folder, extracts and stores page text in Postgres, generates local vector embeddings with Ollama, and uses PGVector similarity searches to produce CSV reports that flag semantically duplicate website pages. ## How it works 1. Starts manually and clears the existing PGVector embeddings table and the scraped page text table in Postgres. 2. Lists files in a specified Google Drive folder, filters to the target documents, and processes them in batches. 3. Downloads each HTML file from Google Drive, extracts the main body text, cleans it, and upserts the results into a Postgres table for scraped pages. 4. Reads the scraped page text back from Postgres in batches, splits it into overlapping chunks, and attaches page metadata (sheet_id, file_name, file_url) to each chunk. 5. Generates embeddings locally with Ollama and inserts the chunk vectors and metadata into Postgres (PGVector), deduplicating already-processed pages. 6. Builds an HNSW index in Postgres, computes chunk-to-chunk similarity matches and a pairwise page report, and exports the results as a CSV file. 7. Computes page-level centroid embeddings, finds highly similar page pairs, and exports a page-level duplicate report as a CSV file. ## Setup 1. Add Google Drive OAuth2 credentials and set the Google Drive folder URL/ID used to scan for your HTML files. 2. Add Postgres credentials for a database with the pgvector extension enabled and permissions to create/alter tables and indexes (including HNSW indexes). 3. Add an Ollama credential and ensure the embedding model mxbai-embed-large:latest is available on your Ollama instance. 4. Confirm your source files are HTML documents and that the workflow’s text extraction and similarity thresholds match your content and desired duplicate sensitivity. ## Requirements - Working instance of n8n, either self-hosted or on the cloud. Remember, this workflow can be computationally expensive. - Google Drive API (with OAuth setup in n8n credentials section) - Ollama (for open source models) or any Embedding model API - PostgreSQL with PGVector or any other vector database - PgAdmin (for PostgreSQL) or your interface to access database tables via SQL for troubleshooting (optional). ## Additional info Limitations and Enhancements: Physical system memory mxbai-embed-large Running through Ollama is free and private, but the embedding generation speed depends entirely on your hardware. The more system memory you have, the more data you can process in batches in the loop node. Similarity threshold and boilerplate content The cosine distance used in this workflow is 0.15 for chunk-level matching. And 0.05 (similarity above 95%) of the threshold is used for page-level centroid matching. This is only the starting point. Once you have the data, and especially if your data has more noise, you might need to tweak these thresholds for better matching. This workflow needs HTML files to extract text This workflow doesn't crawl a website or fetch pages by entering a URL. You need to download HTML files (rendered or source) for consumption. Use parallel processing and Cloud APIs Two sub-processes take the most time: Downloading HTML files from Google Drive Creating vector embeddings If you can use parallel processing in n8n and execute these sub-processes in parallel, the process will be done much faster. Additionally, if you can use cloud APIs for embedding, it may save some you some processing time as well. Use efficient SQL queries Since I am from a non-tech background and not a coder, I used a mix of Gemini, Perplexity and Claude to create SQL codes for this workflow. If you're better at it, you can run computationally efficient queries that would help you achieve better results with less computation expense and time.

View

Answer BigQuery questions in Microsoft Teams with Claude 3.5 dual agents

## Quick overview Turn Microsoft Teams into a natural language BI tool. This dual-agent Claude workflow intelligently classifies user questions, generates safe BigQuery SQL, executes the query, and returns a plain-English summary alongside a data preview directly to your Teams channel. ## How it works 1. The workflow listens for new messages in a designated Microsoft Teams channel or chat. 2. It checks a 24-hour static data cache for your BigQuery schema. If the cache is missing or expired, it automatically fetches the latest INFORMATION_SCHEMA metadata. 3. A main Claude 3.5 Sonnet agent classifies the user's intent (analytical, conversational, or unsafe) and identifies the relevant database tables. 4. If the intent is analytical, a specialized Claude SQL sub-agent generates a read-only SELECT query tailored exactly to your schema. 5. The workflow executes the query against BigQuery (safely constrained to a maximum of 100 rows). 6. A final Claude agent translates the raw query results into a concise, plain-English summary. 7. The answer is posted back to Teams as an Adaptive Card, complete with a formatted data preview and the generated SQL code. 8. Non-analytical questions or pipeline errors are intelligently routed to receive standard conversational replies in Teams. ## Setup 1. CRITICAL SECURITY: Restrict your Google Cloud Service Account IAM roles to BigQuery Data Viewer and BigQuery Job User ONLY. Do not use a highly privileged account. 2. Configure your Microsoft Teams trigger and posting credentials, specifying the target team and channel for the bot to operate in. 3. Configure your Google BigQuery credentials to allow reading metadata and executing queries. 4. Configure your Anthropic credentials for the three Claude LangChain nodes. 5. Update the "Configure Variables" node with your specific GCP Project ID and BigQuery Dataset ID. ## Requirements - A Google Cloud project with BigQuery enabled and existing structured datasets. - An Anthropic API key with access to the Claude 3.5 Sonnet model. - Microsoft Teams administrator access to authorize the n8n integration. ## Customization - Distributed Environments: If you are running n8n with multiple worker nodes (Queue Mode), you must swap the $getWorkflowStaticData() schema cache logic to read/write from a dedicated Key-Value store (like Redis or Supabase) to ensure state synchronization. - UI Layout: Modify the Create Teams Adaptive Card node to add corporate branding, custom colors, or alter the FactSet data preview structure. ## Additional info This architecture features built-in pipeline protections, including strict 40,000-character payload limits to prevent LLM context window blowouts, and fallback handling for "zero-row" query results to ensure users are never left without a response.

View

Need Custom Automation?

Get help designing a custom n8n workflow that connects your stack and fits your process.

Automate academic literature reviews with GPT-4 and multi-database search

Workflow preview

Important notice

1. Workflow Overview

Best for

Tools used

Source and attribution

1.1 Workflow description

Overview

What You Can Do

Who It's For

The Problem It Solves

1.2 Logical Blocks

2. Block-by-Block Analysis

Block 1 - Review Overview

Block 2 - Database Search

Block 3 - Study Quality

Block 4 - Final Review

Block 5 - Set Search Parameters

Block 6 - PDF Vector - Search Papers

Block 7 - Rank & Select Papers

Block 8 - Process One by One

Block 9 - Has PDF?

Block 10 - PDF Vector - Parse Paper

Block 11 - Analyze Paper Content

Block 12 - Store Review Entry

Block 13 - Compile Literature Review

3. Summary Table

4. Reproducing the Workflow from Scratch

1. Download the workflow JSON

2. Import the template into n8n

3. Configure credentials and variables

4. Test with sample data

5. Activate and monitor

5. General Notes & Resources

Frequently asked questions